Light and snow reveal the ability to visualize large scale turbulent structures using natural snowfall.
where have you seen it? not anywhere…
Google engineers have concluded renewable energy production like wind and solar are a waste of time and resources [Quixote’s] as reported by Margaret Wente in the G&M:
“But the fundamental problem with Big Wind is much bigger than its cost and unreliability. The problem is that today’s renewable energy technologies won’t save us from the effects of climate change – and we’re wasting our time by trying.”
If Google says so, it must be right (smile), but the MacWynne gov’t will keep on with this massive tax scam
[you may need a subscription to continue to the G&M article]
All but one of the incumbents were re-elected Oct.27 to Wainfleet Town Council.
Re-elected were, Mayor April Jeffs, Alderman Richard Dykstra, Alderman Ted Hessels, and Alderman Betty Konc.
New to Council will be Alderman Terry Gilmore.
Town Council meeting previously scheduled for Oct.28/14 has been cancelled. Next Meeting is Nov.11 and coincides with the dedication of the new Cenotaph for the Township of Wainfleet.
Unofficial Results: Elected.
The Ongoing Controversy over Turbines continues, is the gist of this CHCH TV report [also blogged on OntWindResistance]. TV reporter, Lisa Hepfner tries to examine both sides of the issue in West Lincoln (which will soon be metal porcupine country with a total of 77 IWT’s). The IWT’s will stretch from West Lincoln to Wainfleet.
The reporter quotes residents who are being bombarded with noise & health issues. She also quotes OPA on the issue, whose spokesman tells what amounts to a duplicitous lie: Shawn Cronkwright, Ontario Power Authority: “With wind turbines, you have to pay to install the equipment, but after the equipment is installed the cost of the fuel is zero. Wind actually is a key piece of keeping prices lower in the entire portfolio.”
The zero cost of “fuel” is disingenuous, to say the least. There’s the huge cost of accessing that “fuel” paid for with tax dollars in the billions; there’s the huge cost of paying for the consumption of that “fuel”, and the huge cost of re-selling that excess “fuel” to other jurisdictions at a less than the cost of production. Then there are the hidden healthcare costs caused by the effects of that “fuel”, the transmission costs (hydro has to shut down to allow wind energy onto the Grid); the air pollution costs caused by the diesel engines needed to operate the turbines; and the costs of lost agricultural production from the industrialized land needed to erect these 60 story towers.
And let’s not even mention the slaughter of millions of flying creatures the earth needs to keep its balance.
Or the Charter Rights being breached by forced acceptance of turbine development. Or the loss of land value. Or increased carbon emissions.
Wind energy is not “free” or “clean” or “green”; these words are government and industry mantras aimed at deluding the public into thinking that the outmoded technology of wind is cutting edge. The edge has been dulled in Europe and the many countries that are abandoning it. Landowners who give their land over to the production of wind instead of crops will be disappointed when their “windfall” lasts much less than 20 years, when the landscape will be dotted with stopped and rusting turbines. But the thieves who run this scheme will have had their money and others will have left office.
Wind Farm Appeal (OWR)
Why Wind Energy is a Bad Idea
AUGUST 12, 2014, by DONN, retired energy expert from GE.
There are essentially four reasons why wind energy is a bad idea.
It is unreliable
It is very, very expensive
It produces electricity when it isn’t needed
It has environmental issues (…)
More importantly, the nameplate ratings of wind turbines overstate the amount of electricity they can produce. Wind turbines in the United States have had a capacity factor of around 32%, or lower during the recent past.
Capacity factor is the amount of electricity a wind turbine, or any other power generation method, produces over a year, compared with how much it could produce using its nameplate rating.
Coal-powered and NGCC power plants typically have a capacity factor of around 85%, while nuclear power plants have a capacity factor of 90% or higher.
What the Ontario Budget means for electricity ratepayers: Parker Gallant
posted by Wind Concerns Ontario.
Expecting a break? No way!!! “Gross savings to ratepayers from the DRC is about $315 million (4.5 million ratepayers X $70) and the loss to ratepayers of the OCEB will cost $720 million (4.5 million ratepayers X $160).”
“Now the bad news: the additional $100 in annual costs will be augmented by the following budget items. And that doesn’t include the additional cost of solar, wind and biomass that will come on stream.
Read the full comment from Parker Gallant here: Ontario2014Budget”.
I’ve been away, enjoying the wind without turbines, so this GOOD news arrived before my return.
The Welland Tribune reports [Greg Furminger] that the Appellants, Tara&Mike Pitt, will appeal the ERT decision against them concerning the building of two turbine that will intersect their flight path [OWR also reports] in Wainfleet. Construction has been halted by Court order until the Appeal is heard and a decision handed down. The construction site is approx. 1.5 km from Skydive Burnaby.
The Appeal to the ERT was filed last October over concerns that the IWT’s will pose a serious hazard for skydivers. The Appeal failed (decision handed down in May). A new Appeal will be heard in August, 18th & 19th, but this time by the Ontario Divisional Court (which is to say, not by the rubber-stamp government agency).
Despite the evidence, and in spite of recent deaths caused by pilots hitting turbines, the ERT has rejected the appeal and construction on two turbines will proceed. Read the details here Erie Media.
The MOE will push through as many approvals as it can before the provincial election.
Here’s the reaction of a Wainfleet Councillor in an email sent to K. Wynne, with the Subject, Thank You:
Dear Ms. Wynne,
I thought I would take a few minutes from my busy schedule as an alderman in a small rural community in the Niagara Region, to thank you for helping to turn our rural community into an industrial waste land and to take a viable business that has been in the community since World War 1 into one that will be severely impacted and probably will have to close its doors. How does the GEA give one monster business the ability to come unwanted into our community and crush the life out of another small well established local business ??
Your stubborn insistence that alternative energy projects be rubber stamped and forced on rural communities is pretty arrogant considering that you and your cronies have been told time and again that there is no need for alternative energy, the province has an over abundance of it to the point where we literally have to pay other jurisdictions to take it. This is creating hydro prices that are ridiculous in the extreme, especially it the Niagara Region because we have the cleanest greenest energy available in Niagara Falls.
In case you are unable to connect the dots, allow me to do so. We have hydro that is too expensive, therefore we have manufacturing that is leaving the province in droves heading to New York State, because they are offering hydro for next to nothing and giving building incentives and huge tax breaks to relocate there. This in turn is causing many job losses in the province and making people who had good paying jobs to turn to welfare. We have senior citizens on fixed incomes who already have had to make choices of heat or food, as well as those forced out of good paying jobs that went south to NY state who are now working a couple of part time jobs to make ends meet, as well as single parents In low income brackets all faced with the same idea, heat and hydro or food……BTW this is called energy poverty and will be coming to a neighborhood near you, if it isn’t already.
Now we have a local business that is no doubt going to be forced out of business thanks to you and your silly GEA that was voted on by 59 members of parliament and rammed through the process without the normal timeframe for all the rest of the members to read it and pose questions or objections. So again thanks for the forethought that went into this, I am sure you have many good friends in the wind industry, however that doesn’t do us out here in rural Ontario much good does it? Thanks so much for giving us all the opportunity to experience seeing our friends lose their livelihood and their passion not to mention a decrease in tourist dollars and Job loss, which again will have a negative impact on our community.
So far I am not seeing any positives with these turbine outcomes, so thanks for that too.
Get a clue,